Oliver Glasner da Neco Williams duka sun kai hari kan mai taimaka wa kwallon da kyamara (VAR) bayan an hana kwallon Williams ta rabin wasa na biyu a cikin 0-0 da Nottingham Forest suka yi da Tottenham Hotspur a City Ground.

Alkalin wasa Craig Pawson ya fara ba da izinin kwallon, amma VAR Peter Bankes ya sa baki, yana hukunta cewa Williams ya taba kwallon da hannunsa kafin ya tura ta a ciki — bayan wani tsaro mai ban mamaki daga Tottenham. Cibiyar hukumar wasan Premier League ta tabbatar a shafin X cewa Bankes ya yanke hukunci cewa Williams ya taba kwallon da hannunsa tun kafin ya ci kuma ya ba da shawarar soke kwallon.

Glasner: 'VAR ba zai iya sa baki idan yana kawai tsammani ba'

Manajan Forest, Glasner, bai jinkirta ba wajen suka, yana mai cewa shaidu ba su isa ba. "Na kalli kusurwa biyar ko shida daban-daban kuma, gaskiya, daga kusurwa daya za ka yi tsammani cewa kwallon ta taba hannu domin rigar ta motsa kadan, amma ba a bayyana ba — kwallon ce ko Sandro Tonali ne a kan layin kofar?" in ji shi.

"Ina ganin VAR ba zai iya sa baki idan yana kawai tsammani ba. Ba a bayyana ba kuma ba a fili ba," Glasner ya ci gaba. "Mun sami taƙaitaccen bayani kafin kakar wasan cewa ƙofar sa bakin VAR a wannan shekarar ya kamata ya kasance mai tsauri sosai, shine ya sa wannan sa bakin kuskure ne. Idan ba a bayyana 100% ba, riƙe yanke shawarwarin da aka yi a filin wasa. Wannan shi ne rashin daidaituwa a yau."

Glasner ya ƙara da cewa ya sanar da alkalin wasa Pawson bayan ƙarshen wasa cewa ya yi imanin yakamata a ba da izinin kwallon.

Williams ya tsaya cewa ya yi kai

Williams kansa ya kasance mai tsayuwa, yana gaya wa Sky Sports cewa kwallon ta taɓa kansa — ba hannunsa ba. "Kwal ne," in ji shi. "VAR yana nan ne idan akwai kuskure mai bayyanawa da fili kuma a gare ni ba ta yiwu ba. Na ga hotuna da sake duba tare kuma a babu lokaci na yi zaton na yi handball. Na yi kai a tsakanin hannuwana."

"Na san nan da nan na yi kai a tsakanin hannuwana. Ban san inda zan fara ba. Abin takaici," mai tsaron gefe ya ƙara bayyana.

Iyaka tsakanin hujja da tsammani

Bisa dokokin hannu na Premier League, idan kwallon ta taba hannun wanda ya ci ƙwallo nan da nan kafin a ci kwal, dole ne a soke ta — ko da ba da gangan ba. Babbar tambaya, duk da haka, ita ce ko kwallon ta taɓa hannun Williams kwata-kwata.

Don soke wasan gaskiya kamar wannan, ana sa ran VAR ya sami tabbatacciyar hujja — ma'auni wanda wasu ke ganin ya fi maƙan ma ta abin da ake nufi da "kuskure mai bayyanawa da fili" da ake amfani da shi wajen yanke shawara mafi zurfin ra'ayi kamar hukuncin tazarce. Kusancin kai da hannuwan Williams yayin faruwar lamarin ya sa wannan yanke shawara ta zama mai wuya musamman.

Ya cancanta a lura cewa an yarda da kwallon Harry Maguire kan Ipswich a karshen mako da ya gabata duk da hannu, domin harbin asali yana kan hanyar waje kafin ya karkace ya shiga ciki, wanda ya mai da shi kwal ta kansa. A yanayin Williams, shi ne wanda ya ci tsauri, don haka duk taɓawa da hannu — ko da ƙarama — ta isa ta soke kwal bisa dokokin wasa.

Kamar yadda Glasner, Williams, da masu goyon bayan Forest ke kin yarda, wani VAR a wata rana mai yiwuwa ya isa ga ƙarshe daban — kuma wannan, a ƙarshe, ya kasance ɗaya daga cikin mafi girman takaici da wannan fasaha ke kawo a duniyar ƙwallon ƙafa.