Karshen UEFA Champions League na Asabar ya ya kawo wasan kwaikwayo ba wai a filin wasa kadai ba, har ma a dakin alkalan wasa, inda jerin yanke-shawara masu cece-kuce suka kunna muhawara mai zafi tsakanin 'yan wasa, manajoji, da magoya baya.

Masanin alkalanci Andy Davies ya yi nazari mai zurfi kan kowace yanke-shawara da ta haifar da rigima a wasann, yana ba da kimantawa daki-daki kan yadda alkalai — da VAR — suka gudanar da wasu daga cikin muhimman lokuta na wasan.

Mendes da Madueke: tushen rikici na tsakiya

Kalubalen da ya jawo hankalin kowa ya shafi Nuno Mendes da Noni Madueke. An binciki lamarin daga kusurwoyi da yawa, inda masu kallo da dama suka yi tambaya kan ko alkali ya yanke hukunci daidai a lokacin.

Bayan nazari mai zurfi ta VAR, Davies ya kammala cewa hukuncin da aka yanke a filin wasa ya kasance daidai — ko da yake ya yarda cewa ya kasance yanke-shawara mai kusa sosai, irin wanda zai iya raba ra'ayi ko tsakanin alkalai masu gogewa.

Karshen da yanke-shawara masu kusanci suka bayyana

Bayan lamarin Mendes-Madueke, karshen ya ƙunshi wasu lokuta da yawa inda alkalanci ya zo ƙarƙashin hasken bincike. An binciki kowace yanke-shawara ɗaya bayan ɗaya, Davies yana bayyana dalilin da ke bayan kowace hukunci da kuma ko VAR ta shiga tsakani daidai.

Wannan nazarin ya nuna yadda iyakoki suke ƙanana a mafi girman matakin ƙwallon ƙafa na kulob din Turai — inda tsarin bidiyo guda ɗaya na iya zama bambanci tsakanin jan kati da tserewa hukunci, ko tsakanin bugun fanareti da aka ba da shi da kuma kwal da aka karɓa.

Ga magoya bayan UEFA Champions League, muhawara kan alkalanci a karshen ba sabuwar abu ba ce. Amma da VAR yanzu ta zama wani abu na dindindin, tsammanin samun amsoshi masu tabbaci ya taba yin girma fiye da kowane lokaci — ko da yake, kamar yadda nazarin Davies ke nuna, gaskiya ta kasance tana kusa da layin rarrabuwa.