Brighton & Hove Albion manager Fabian Hurzeler questioned Liverpool's creative ambition after his side fell to a 2-0 defeat at Anfield, suggesting only one of the two teams showed any real intent to build attacking play.

Despite the loss, Hurzeler struck a defiant tone — insisting that Brighton were the side willing to take the game to the opposition, even on a ground as imposing as Anfield. His remarks drew a pointed contrast between how the two clubs approached the match.

Liverpool secured the victory without necessarily needing to dominate with the ball, while Brighton pushed forward and looked to impose their style. Yet it was Arne Slot's side who left with all three points and a clean sheet.

Hurzeler's comments reflect a broader debate about what constitutes attacking football. For a manager who has built Brighton's identity around proactive, possession-based play, conceding that the result went against his team while still claiming the moral high ground on creativity is a bold stance.

It is not the first time Brighton have felt hard done by despite playing what they see as the better football — the club has long prided itself on a style that prioritises building from the back and creating chances through structured, purposeful passing.

Whether Hurzeler's dig will spark a response from the Anfield camp remains to be seen, but the Brighton boss was clearly unwilling to accept defeat without registering his view on how the game unfolded.